John Stossel’s latest column is titled Utahns Can Vote for School Choice Tuesday and delves into the issue of choice in public schools. No, not the kind of choice that allows eleven-year-olds to secretly get contraceptives in Portland, Maine but the kind of choice that really matters: the choice of which school to go to.
This issue is vitally important to anyone who is subjected to public schools. Our students are testing well behind other country’s students of the same age and thanks to this dynamic we are becoming less competitive internationally. Speaking from personal experiences I can tell you that the teachers I had in public schools weren’t usually good. They were fine women and men (mostly women) but it just seemed like most of them just really didn’t care so much about teaching. We would waste time in class doing pointless activities and we would be saddled with piles of busy work to take home.
The most plausible reason for why this teaching environment was allowed to fester was because there was no threat to the teacher’s job. All of these teachers are in the same union getting paid not on how well their students perform but on how many years they’ve logged grading book reports. Reconnecting pay with performance for teachers will put the impetus back where it belongs.
Schools are the same. No matter what they do they’re going to get their money. In fact, if they prove that they’re falling behind they probably will get more money! Allowing parents to choose which school their kids go to there will be a heck of a lot more pressure put on the schools to do better. The threat of losing all those students and all that money will force schools to either shape up or go bankrupt.
Here’s the main points of Stossel’s most column:
They say they’re all for improving education but not by introducing choice. “When it comes to providing every Utah child with a quality education, we believe, as do most Americans, that our greatest hope for success is investing in research-proven reforms. These include the things parents and teachers know will make a difference in the classroom, such as smaller class sizes and investment in teacher development programs. Focusing on this type of reform will bring far greater success than diverting tax dollars to an alternative education system.”
Please. I’ve heard that song for years. Government schools in America fail while spending on average more than $11,000 per student. Utah spends $7,500. Think what an innovative education entrepreneur would do with so much money. It’s more than $150,000 per classroom!
The answer to mediocre public schooling isn’t to give a government monopoly more “teacher development programs.” The answer is competition.
Bureaucrats and unions tremble at the thought. On my “20/20″ special on education, one teacher had the nerve to sneer, “Competition is not for children!” The opposite is true. Competition and choice mean parent power. It’s parents whom the education lobby really fears. The last thing it wants is a system in which parents choose their children’s schools. Parents might not choose the union-dominated establishment schools. Better not take that chance.
The sad fact is that no matter what we do the unions and the schools are always going to oppose capitalism because it hurts their interests. Why should they want to change rules that protects them no matter how hard they try? Really, they don’t have any reason to fight for change. But we do and we must fight to bring back capitalism’s sledgehammer that destroys everything that fails to produce.
Thomas Sowell, the devilishly good looking man in the picture, is the other capitalist I referred to in the title. He and Walter Williams (another economist) are the reasons I got one of my degrees in Economics. What attracted me to their way of thinking was how they brought absolute reason to every topic they talk or write about. OK, that’s it for the ridiculous fawning on my part, now to the meat and potatoes.
He has a column out today titled ‘Driving While Black’. As you may have surmised by looking at Mr. Sowell’s picture he just happens to be black and that is probably why he put fingers to keyboard to write this column. Well, and that little fact about him getting a paycheck probably had something to do about it.
The article is about how cops aren’t racist SOBs. Mr. Sowell relates how he has been pulled over numerous times and he never thought the reason was because of his particular skin pigmentation. In fact, no one in his family has been subjected to our racist men in blue’s malicious racial profiling. So what’s up?
He answers this question by retelling a story another black man, a journalist told him.
Recently a well-known black journalist told me of a very different experience. He happened to be riding along in a police car driven by a white policeman. Ahead of them was a car driving at night with no headlights on and, in the dark, it was impossible to see who was driving it.
When the policeman pulled the car over, a black driver got out and, when the policeman told him that he was driving without his lights on, the driver said, “You only pulled me over because I am black!”
This was said even though he saw the black man who was with the policeman. The driver got a ticket.
Later, when the journalist asked the cop how often he got such responses from black drivers, the reply was “About 80 percent of the time.”
When the same journalist asked the same question of black cops, the answer was about 30 percent of the time — lower, but still an amazing percentage under the circumstances.
Maybe there is a little paranoia going around in the black community. There is this common perception that blacks are more likely to get pulled over just because of their race and this perception is being fueled by black leaders who are “supporting” the black race. This perception has obviously permeated the black community and, even when a cop is pulling over a man whose face he couldn’t see was black, the black person automatically thinks it’s all about their race. It’s really too bad that racial tensions are being stoked to such an extreme extent in this country that we have black men and women accusing officers of racism even when there isn’t any.
Mr. Sowell goes on to explain how a book, called Are Cops Racist?, empirically looked at the data and found no statistical evidence of racial profiling. Putting my own two cents in I would have to agree. I live on a street with a bunch of cops. Never have I thought that any of them would pull over someone just because they are a certain skin color.
The most important thing I’ve learned from capitalist thinkers like Stossel and Sowell is to never trust conventional wisdom. There is always a common sense reason things are the way they are. America’s public schools are failing because there is absolutely no competition forcing the schools and teachers to improve their services. There isn’t an epidemic of blacks getting harassed by cops because cops are usually moral people doing a very tough job that doesn’t afford the cops enough free time to harass law-abiding citizens. Use your common sense and you to, someday, could be as logical as these two scions of capitalism. BigT
Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!
Take Me To Your Homepage!