Even though you control the media, have a strangelhold on the political system, and have more power than anyone else in the country doesn’t necessarily mean the people like you.
Riot police used tear gas Wednesday to block hundreds of Venezuelans protesting the latest moves by President Hugo Chavez to concentrate his power. The demonstrators said a blacklist of opposition candidates and a series of socialist decrees are destroying what’s left of their democracy.
Though the protest of about 1,000 people chanting “freedom!” was small compared to past marches, there is a growing public outcry over the sidelining of key government opponents ahead of state and local elections in November.
Chavez opponents also are outraged by 26 laws the president just decreed, some of them mirroring the socialist measures voters rejected in a December referendum.
“We said in the referendum that we didn’t want that, and now he’s put it in the decrees,” said protester Josefina Bravo, a 59-year-old who wore a sticker reading “No means no” on her baseball cap. “That’s the problem we have: All the powers are concentrated in the president.”
This is what I don’t get about socialism - actually, this is what I don’t get about people’s support of socialism. If it is “all for the people” why don’t socialist regimes let the people vote? Why does there need to be a vanguard of socialists leading the way?
The way I see it is that socialism, communism, fascism, totalitarianism, statism, and the hundred other parsings of meaning of too much government power is that all this is is a throwback to the days of feudalism. With these countries run by the government you have those in power telling everyone what they need to be doing. Hell, even what they should eat, where they can go for health care, what jobs they can have.
And the people of Venezuela are getting sick and tired of this authoritarian thug.
Will it matter? Probably not. But this is a start. Hopefully it will lead to something but I doubt it will lead to much.
They just don’t have any power since it was all taken away from them. Chavez controls nearly everything in his country. How are the citizens of Venezuela supposed to defy him? Even when they did last year, voting in a referendum against Chavez’s slate of laws, he’s just decreed that they are laws now. Ipso facto, the people don’t matter. They never do in socialist countries.
BigT
Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

Take Me To Your Homepage!

Would any one of us go for this? I don’t think so.
The Chinese government confirmed Wednesday what journalists arriving at the lavishly outfitted media center here had suspected: Contrary to previous assurances by Olympic and government officials, the Internet would be censored during the upcoming games.
Since the Olympic Village press center opened Friday, reporters have been unable to access scores of Web pages - politically sensitive ones that discuss Tibetan succession, Taiwanese independence, the violent crackdown of the protests in Tiananmen Square and the sites of Amnesty International, Radio Free Asia and several Hong Kong newspapers known for their freewheeling political discourse.
On Wednesday - two weeks after its most recent proclamation of an uncensored Internet during the Summer Games - the International Olympic Committee quietly agreed to some of the limitations, according to Kevan Gosper, chairman of the IOC press commission, Reuters reported.
We live in a global economy. Information goes both ways… eventually. The Chinese government is trying to hold back a tsunami of information - I wonder when the tsunami will finally break through?
BigT
Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

Take Me To Your Homepage!

a recent AP poll found that only 6% of Americans would describe Obama as “liberal,” let alone socialist.
But is that true?
A careful reading of Obama’s first memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” reveals that his childhood mentor up to age 18 — a man he cryptically refers to as “Frank” — was none other than the late communist Frank Marshall Davis, who fled Chicago after the FBI and Congress opened investigations into his “subversive,” “un-American activities.”
As Obama was preparing to head off to college, he sat at Davis’ feet in his Waikiki bungalow for nightly bull sessions. Davis plied his impressionable guest with liberal doses of whiskey and advice, including: Never trust the white establishment.
“They’ll train you so good,” he said, “you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh**.”
After college, where he palled around with Marxist professors and took in socialist conferences “for inspiration,” Obama followed in Davis’ footsteps, becoming a “community organizer” in Chicago.
His boss there was Gerald Kellman, whose identity Obama also tries to hide in his book. Turns out Kellman’s a disciple of the late Saul “The Red” Alinsky, a hard-boiled Chicago socialist who wrote the “Rules for Radicals” and agitated for social revolution in America.
The Chicago-based Woods Fund provided Kellman with his original $25,000 to hire Obama. In turn, Obama would later serve on the Woods board with terrorist Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground. Ayers was one of Obama’s early political supporters.
After three years agitating with marginal success for more welfare programs in South Side Chicago, Obama decided he would need to study law to “bring about real change” — on a large scale.
While at Harvard Law School, he still found time to hone his organizing skills. For example, he spent eight days in Los Angeles taking a national training course taught by Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation. With his newly minted law degree, he returned to Chicago to reapply — as well as teach — Alinsky’s “agitation” tactics.
(A video-streamed bio on Obama’s Web site includes a photo of him teaching in a University of Chicago classroom. If you freeze the frame and look closely at the blackboard Obama is writing on, you can make out the words “Power Analysis” and “Relationships Built on Self Interest” — terms right out of Alinsky’s rule book.)
So, no, it’s not true. Senator Obama is, based on his cumulative voting record, the most leftist Senator in America.
You can see why Obama was ranked, hands-down, the most liberal member of the Senate by the National Journal. Some, including colleague and presidential challenger John McCain, think he’s the most liberal member in Congress.
But could he really be “more left,” as McCain recently remarked, than self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (for whom Obama has openly campaigned, even making a special trip to Vermont to rally voters)?
Obama’s voting record, going back to his days in the Illinois statehouse, says yes. His career path — and those who guided it — leads to the same unsettling conclusion.
Just thought you wanted to know the real Obama. Have a nice day.
BigT
Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

Take Me To Your Homepage!
