ConservativeINC

August 14, 2008

U.S. and Poland sign missile shield deal

Filed under: War — admin @ 2:36 pm

Maybe Russia miscalculated when it went balls out into Georgia because now it looks like it is pushing their former satellites closer to the United States.

Poland finally agreed on Thursday to host elements of U.S. global anti-missile system on its territory after Washington improved the terms of the deal amid the Georgia crisis.

The preliminary deal was signed by deputy Polish Foreign Minister Andrzej Kremer and U.S. chief negotiator John Rood. It still needs to be endorsed by the Polish parliament.

The signing comes after Prime Minister Donald Tusk had been holding out for enhanced military cooperation with the United States in return for consent to host 10 interceptor rockets at a base in northern Poland.

This can only be considered a blunder on Russia’s part.

“We feel at the moment a greater concern for our safety,” said Bogdan Klich, the Polish defence minister, evoking fears of a resurgent Russia, widespread in the former Eastern Bloc. “That’s why every installation of the Western world on the Polish territory has its meaning, because it anchors Poland more deeply to the West.”

While America says the shield is designed to destroy lone missiles from “rogue states” such as Iran, Russia considers it a strategic encirclement that undermines its nuclear deterrent. If fully agreed now, the system would be ready by around 2012.

A letter from the President of the Polish American Congress, Frank J. Spuula, to the President of Poland probably sums up the best what the people from the former Eastern bloc are thinking right now:

The ongoing events in Georgia provide me and all those who witness these tragic  developments with a sobering reminder that the struggles for democracy are not easily won, and that there is no end to this fight until powers such as Russia cease to arbitrarily impose their will on much smaller and militarily weaker nations by the unprincipled and reckless exercise of their military superiority.

As an American of Polish descent whose ancestors lived under Russian oppression, I expect that my country – the United States of America – will do everything in its power to reasonably succor the people and the democratically-elected government of Georgia because, as we are the world’s best exemplar of democracy that upholds rather than tramples on human rights, it is the morally right thing to do.

Can Russia do anything about Poland now? Nope, not much.

Russia would appear to have few options for punishing Poland, a member of both the EU and NATO with a far larger military and economy than Georgia, but after last week it would be foolish to underestimate what Vladimir Putin can accomplish with limited military and political resources.

What was the sticking point to these negotiations that had been going on for almost two years?

The announcement on Thursday evening involves the condition demanded by Warsaw that an additional arsenal of Patriot missiles be stationed in Poland without time limits. Washington, it is believed, had been offering Patriots for a limited time period, even as short as one year.

 

American troops will jointly run the antimissile base and there will be a US garrison in Poland by 2012.

Why is this needed so much now? Well, Russia is using the types of missiles in Georgia that a missile defense shield would protect against.

Riki Ellison, President of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance ( www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org), issued the following statements about the situation in Europe concerning Russia, Poland and the Republic of Georgia. “Over the last few days Russia has fired over two dozen SS-21 Ballistic Short Range Missiles into the country of Georgia, integrating ballistic missile strikes with their conventional military forces. The SS-21 is a road mobile, solid fuel, single stage ballistic missile, which is maneuverable in flight and carries a high-explosive warhead weighing up to 1060lbs. with 150 meter accuracy. It has a range of 43 miles. These missiles have been used by the Russians tactically for psychological and military targets as the Georgians do not have the capability to defend against or defeat ballistic missiles. “The use of ballistic missiles by Russia in this conflict sends an endorsement to the international community that the use of ballistic missiles has value, thus propelling countries and terrorist organizations to develop, purchase and continue to proliferate ballistic missiles. Modern warfare continues to integrate and use ballistic missiles as a tactic. “This outward military aggression with the use of ballistic missiles from Russia on a former USSR country sends a very serious message to all former members of the Soviet Block, especially Poland

How about us, the American public, do we support this move?

A national poll released today revealed that 87 percent of the American Public believes that the United States should have a missile defense system. The public survey showed that 58% of the American Public thinks that there is a real threat from missiles carrying weapons of mass destruction and that missile defense is the preferred option over pre-emptive military action or diplomatic efforts for dealing with the proliferation of missiles and weapons of mass destruction by nation states.

This is a lot of information to digest, I know. But I think it is vitally important for our long-term strategic goals.

A missile defense shield will protect our homeland and the countries of our newest allies, countries that use to live under the thumb of the Soviet Union. By taking away one of Russia’s greatest weapons, missiles, we are going a long way towards ensuring the security of our allies.

And as the poll shows, most people think this is a far better option than pre-emptively going into a hostile country for defensive purposes. While I’m not completely sold on abandoning pre-emptive action, not at all actually, I do think that missile defense is absolutely necessary. It gives us a higher level of protection that we haven’t had since the introduction of ICBMs.

The other thing that this type of agreement brings about is greater closeness between ourselves and the former Soviet bloc nations. These countries offer some of the most inspiring stories. Just a couple of decades ago they lived under tyranny - now they have surging economies, thriving democracies, and such a love for liberty that I don’t think has been seen on the international stage since our own fight for independence over two-hundred years ago.

Give it time, there will be naysayers. Neo-commies will cry about this for sure, internationalists will have a fit, the backers of multi-polarity will cry foul. But think about it. With this missile defense system we are giving protection to tens of millions of people. Yes, they will still have to worry about Russian tanks and terrorist suicide bombers but they will no longer have to worry about ceaseless death from above.

This is a great move. Too bad it took the invasion of Georgia to push this action forward.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




August 7, 2008

Iraq/US Nearing Timetable for Withdrawal

Filed under: War — admin @ 2:27 pm

Doesn’t this take away a major plank from Barack Obama’s platform?

Iraq and the U.S. are near an agreement on all American combat troops leaving Iraq by October 2010, with the last soldiers out three years after that, two Iraqi officials told The Associated Press on Thursday. U.S. officials, however, insisted no dates had been agreed.

The proposed agreement calls for Americans to hand over parts of Baghdad’s Green Zone - where the U.S. Embassy is located - to the Iraqis by the end of 2008. It would also remove U.S. forces from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, according to the two senior officials, both close to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and familiar with the negotiations.

The officials, who spoke separately on condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing, said all U.S. combat troops would leave Iraq by October 2010, with the remaining support personnel gone “around 2013.” The schedule could be amended if both sides agree - a face-saving escape clause that would extend the presence of U.S. forces if security conditions warrant it.

Look, if the Iraqis want us to leave then fine, we’ll leave. It’s just not a good idea to set a timetable in my opinion. Telling the will have an easier time on X date gives them time to regroup and plan attacks in the future.

Furthermore, what if something happens between now and then? Will they stick to the timetable no matter what? What if the Iraqis get their act together and have a fully functioning democracy with good security in place? Will we stay until the expiration date? What happens when a terrorist group detonates a dirty nuke in the Green Zone? Will we say “tough” and leave according to plan?

Bad things happen when a country leaves too early. According to many historians the reason for WWII is that Germany was left in total disrepair after WWI. That cannot be allowed to happen in the Middle East now and I fear that setting a concrete timetable will lead to that.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Beijing Olympics Threatened by Chinese Islamic Terrorists

Filed under: War — admin @ 10:01 am

This group, TIP, has struck within China as recently as July 21. This seams like a credible threat.

A Muslim separatist group in China has made a new video threat against the Beijing Olympics, warning Muslims to keep their children away from the games, a US group that monitors extremists said Thursday.

The nearly six-minute video shows flames consuming a Beijing Olympics logo and an explosion over a venue for the competition, and features a masked, turbaned speaker clutching what appears to be an assault rifle.

The IntelCenter released a copy of the recording, attributed to the Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP), an ethnic Uighur and Muslim organization seeking to create an independent state out of China’s heavily Muslim Xinjiang province.

The SITE Intelligence Group, meanwhile, translated some of the message, which was delivered in the language of the Uighurs, and said that the speaker identified himself as a TIP member and issued a threat against the Games.

The speaker urges Muslims to keep their children from the competition, and warns “Do not stay on the same bus, on the same train, on the same plane, in the same buildings, or any place the Chinese are,” SITE said.

To see the video, click HERE.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress