I have no doubt that we can both find many “liberals” doing something bad, and many “conservatives” doing something bad. I expect that you would say that Mark Foley is not representative of Republicans or conservatives in general (and I agree, by the way). If Foley’s case is not representative, why would this instance of a so-called “liberal” doing something bad be representative? And if it is not representative of anything, how is it noteworthy?

To borrow paraphrase you: “You really need to reevaluate your belief system if your knee jerk reaction is to attack a liberal no matter what.”

You are the one that is desperate. At no point did I say that all liberals are child molesters. This is something your side did when the priest child molester scandal came to light (i.e. all priests are child molesters).

Should I just not report on a liberal doing anything bad? Would that make you feel better? You really need to reevaluate your belief system if your knee jerk reaction is to defend a liberal no matter what.

My two points in posting about this was that 1.) if it were a conservative talk radio host who had done this then the media and definitely everyone in the liberal blogosphere (like you) would be saying that this was emblematic of Christian conservatism and 2.) the story of the liberal talk radio host turned child molester wouldn’t get much traction for the opposite reasons.

Seems I’m right.

Rethink your positions,
T